January 05, 2006
Wolf Creek
I would love to ask the director why he made this movie.
It's based on a fascinating case about a serial killer in Australia, but the movie just covers the cruel death of two girls.
No history about the case, no trial, no investigation. Just a serial killer torturing two girls.
What's the point? Serial killers are bad?
Also, I hate seeing movies where characters do everything wrong and seal their doom.
At one point the girls get the upper hand, they injure the killer, he's down, but do they finish the job? No! They run away, screaming, like little babies. Jamie Lee Curtis would have chopped the fuckers head off!
The filmmaker is talented, I believe that.
But why make a film about the most famous serial killer in Australia and then not make a movie about him and the whole fascinating case?
Why just make a snuff film? I'm confused.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment